Eric.R.
|
Street Brawl facingIs there a reason for the facing for non-ordinal facing in SB to be:
Rather than
The latter preserves the fact that the front facing covers 5 spaces when the player is positioned ordinaly.
PS. I have not played a game of SB yet so this is just an observation based on the rules.
|
GalakStarscraper
|
Yeah ... the reason was I didn't want players to put their players facing diagonially. I consider that a bet hedge so I wanted there to be a penalty for doing it.
Galak
|
Eric.R.
|
Then why not just allow ONLY ordinal facings?
And, the more I look at it I cannot see any reason or benifit to face diagonally; either rule- or tactic-wise.
|
GalakStarscraper
|
| Eric.R. wrote: | | Then why not just allow ONLY ordinal facings? |
Didn't want to disallow them .. just wanted there to be a penalty for doing so.
Galak
|
Eric.R.
|
Fair enough, I guess it gives a good reason to properly face your players or your oponnant will force the diagonal.
|
|
|
